I know, I know. You’re tired of the “movement vs. industry” debate, but please play along one more time.
A few months back I claimed the debate wasn’t a particularly important one. Po-tay-to, po-tah-to.
Brent’s What Movement? post swayed me, however. The more I think about it, the more I realize that without a movement, there’s no meaningful difference between a credit union and a bank.
This morning, Bill Taylor spoke on the characteristics of “Maverick” companies and how they stand for more than the status quo “service and convenience” – how companies who make a difference in the marketplace do business with a clear, distinctive, disruptive purpose.
Hearing him speak got me all fired up. He got me thinking about who’s really making a difference out there in credit union land. There are individual credit unions innovating, no doubt, but they’re anomalies among the 8,000. As a whole, the “movement” isn’t moving.
He got me thinking why credit unions were called a movement in the first place.
Credit unions were a movement because they were the original peer-to-peer lenders (not in a predatory sense, either). Joe Factoryworker couldn’t get a loan at the bank, so he and other Joes and Janes pooled their resources. By the way, that peer-to-peer idea is still very powerful (look at Zopa, BitTorrent, etc.).
Credit unions were a movement because the credit union idea spread like a movement spreads. I’m sorry, but healthy movements don’t shrink or stagnate. Maybe that’s a large part of why I’m writing this post.
That being said, I see pockets of movement – but as a whole, we’ve got an industry on our hands. I wholeheartedly want credit unions to regain movement. And if it comes, it’s going to come from innovation, disruption, and uniqueness spreading outward from those pockets much like the movement that created credit unions in the first place.
Bill mentioned movement right off the bat. He started his keynote with, “I’m well aware that this is not just an industry; it’s a movement.” It was the only point of his address of which I’d disagree. In all fairness, even that was half-right. Until further notice, it’s an industry in need of a movement.
We had announced that we’d be coming out to this conference, but we haven’t articulated the big reason why. We’re trying to find those pockets of movement and amplify them. We’re here to take ideas that don’t make it to print – that aren’t being recorded elsewhere save in the notebooks of some real disruptive/innovative CEOs and executive team members – and to help those ideas spread. Hence the “Open Source” in Open Source CU. Free of charge. Take ‘em or leave ‘em.
There was more in Bill’s address than I could possibly cover here. He spoke about Muhammed Yunus and Grameen Bank, ING Direct, Commerce Bank and handfuls of other great examples of disruptive groups fighting for causes. Rather than reporting all that, I wanted to write about the string of firecrackers that he lit in my brain that’s taken me a good four hours to write out.
What else would you expect from the cofounder of Fast Company?!